Barriers to
in silico trials

On 10 March 2016 the European Parliament made a recommendation to the European Medicine Agency to take into account alternative methods in the evaluation of medical products and in particular In Silico methodologies. But as of today, the level of uptake of In Silico Trials, e.g. the use of modelling & simulation for the development and derisking of new medical products, is still fairly limited.

Lack of advanced Models

Predictive models are in many cases not advanced and robust enough to be used in the reduction, refinement and/or replacement of the clinical trials required for the certification of new medical products.

Our goal:

Better models: develop more advanced models for the evaluation of safety and efficacy for both medicinal and medical device products that address specific Contexts of Use (CoUs), but at the same time enable a completely new class of models of disease with a similar pathogenesis.

Lack of independent validation collections

We need widely available collections of curated medical data specifically designed for the development and the validation of In Silico Trials technologies.

Our goal:

Validation collections: define requirements for data used as inputs of In Silico Trials models; analyse contexts of use and define requirements for validation collections; organise collections of existing data; support the formation of prospective collections.

Poorly informated stakeholders

It is crucial to give clear and correct information to all stakeholders (policy makers, patients, doctors, regulators, healthcare payers, Contract Research Organisations (CRO), technology providers, executives of biomedical companies, etc.) on the opportunities and the risks associated with the use of In Silico Trials technologies. Each stakeholder will thus benefit of a rigorous risk-benefit evaluation framework to assess the adoption of In Silico Trials technologies.

Our goal:

Responsible Research & Innovation: policies-watch; risk-benefit and cost-benefit analyses for healthcare professionals; monitor perception of IST among senior management of medical industries; promote citizen trust in IST.

No clear regulatory pathways

The credibility assessment proposed in the ASME VV-40 technical standard is limited to models used to assess medical devices. Pharmaceutical products, Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products, and Combinatory products do not have yet an equivalent standard. Also, the VV-40 is not harmonized in the CEN standardization framework, which makes it unclear on whether it can be used in relation to CE marking submissions. “First in kind” qualifications of In Silico Trials methods for the evaluation of drugs with EMA are proceeding quite slowly. Also, we need to explore new regulatory pathways for class III medical devices and pharmaceutical products that allow a significant reduction of human experimentation with In Silico Trials technologies, and the adoption of a rigorous post-marketing surveillance that monitors the validity of the in silico predictions as the new product is adopted.

Our goal:

Technical standards and regulatory barriers: develop good regulatory practices for the qualification of In Silico Trial models to assess medical devices and medicinal products; pursue first in kind qualification of existing solutions.

Poor scalability and efficiency

At the moment, most In Silico Trials models have insufficient scalability, as long as the lack of efficient computing of large-scale population models in easy-to-use, safe, and trusted environments.

Our goal:

Scalability and efficient computing: improve efficiency (cost and duration) of IST simulations; improve scalability of existing IST solutions, to handle large-scale simulations (from sensitivity analysis to populations); from big data to big simulations: user interfaces to supervise thousands of simulation results; implications of the General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 (GDPR) for large-scale IST simulations.  

Lack of Business models

There is not a clear business model that regulates how to sell in silico applications and services. Different companies use different business models and this leads to an unclear commercial exploitation trajectory.

Our goal:

Exploitation: the In Silico World consortium plans to analyze and define the market sectors involved in the potential business opportunities for the solutions and collections developed in the framework of the project. Once higher visibility in the European community will be achieved through cluster activities, business models and strategies will be developed – in terms of value creation and market orientation – to successfully put on the market the system.

Lack of trained workforce

It is rare to find professionals that have the necessary technical skills on In Silico Trials to work in industry, regulatory agencies, research hospitals, etc., because of the lack of opportunities for training and re-training.

Our goal:

Re-training and education: re-training of technical and non-technical professionals on the use, opportunities and threats IST can provide; revision of the curricula of both technical and non-technical biomedical education to include IST elements.


Go to Results →